Families criticize inaccuracies in Lucy Letby's defense evidence

Families of babies killed by nurse Lucy Letby have raised serious concerns about her new defense team's evidence. They believe it contains many mistakes and inaccuracies, especially regarding medical details. In their statements to a public inquiry, the families addressed claims about infections that two of the deceased babies did not actually have. Their lawyer, Richard Baker, challenged the arguments made by international medical experts who supported Letby in her legal case. One key issue involves "Baby I," who Letby's team claims had a bacterial infection that caused blockages in a breathing tube. The families insist that tests showed Baby I never had such an infection and that the tube was not even present at the time of death. Another claim discussed is about "Baby G," whom Letby reportedly tried to harm. Her defense states Baby G had an infection that led to vomiting. However, the families assert that Baby G became very ill after the attack. Letby is currently serving 15 life sentences for murdering seven babies and attempting to kill seven others. The families have emphasized that they do not believe this new evidence would change the verdicts from her trial.