Lawsuit challenges Arrowhead District's $136 million referendum

A lawsuit has been filed just before a key vote about a $136 million referendum for Arrowhead Union High School District. The suit was brought by a group called Arrowhead No, U.A. They claim the district misled voters about the true costs and the necessity of the proposed projects. John Marek, a member of Arrowhead No, U.A., is leading the opposition. He previously voted against a $262 million proposal and argues there is a lack of transparency from the school district. Marek believes the lawsuit is the last resort to stop the referendum, which he says isn't justified. The district plans to ask voters on April 1 to approve funds to combine two high school buildings and improve safety. Marek and others are concerned about the financial details provided by the school board. The lawsuit claims the total cost, including interest, could rise above $230 million. It also alleges that previous referendum proposals were misleading about expenses. On the other side, some parents, like Kristen Neuman, argue that the referendum is essential for maintaining the school's competitiveness and safety. Neuman is part of a pro-referendum group and believes the legal challenge distracts from important needs within the district. The school district faces an estimated $143 million in maintenance costs over the next 20 years for aging facilities. Supporters of the referendum say it offers a financial solution and will help create a safer environment for students. The voting starts soon, and the community is divided over the referendum and the lawsuit. The outcome will determine the future of school projects in the district.