Ninth Circuit upholds California's large capacity magazine ban

The Ninth Circuit Court has upheld California's ban on large-capacity magazines, which hold more ammunition than standard magazine sizes. This ruling may lead to further review by the Supreme Court. In a 7-4 decision, the majority stated that large-capacity magazines do not play a significant role in self-defense. They highlighted that such magazines have been associated with mass shootings, increasing the harm of these tragic events. The majority opinion emphasized that the Second Amendment protects the right to own firearms, but not the accessories like large-capacity magazines. Judge Lawrence Van Dyke presented a dissenting opinion in an unusual way by including a video where he showcased firearms. He argued that the distinction between guns and accessories is not clear. Other dissenting judges criticized this approach, stating that judges should rely on the evidence presented in court rather than personal demonstrations. This case could have significant implications for gun ownership rights, as states may continue to restrict accessories deemed dangerous. The ruling now has the potential to be appealed to the Supreme Court, where it may join another pending case regarding magazine bans.