Pine-Richland board takes control of library book selections

The Pine-Richland School Board has made a significant change to its library policy. On March 17, the board voted 5-4 to give itself final authority over the selection of books for school libraries. This decision follows months of intense discussions and disagreements in the community. Under the new policy, the school board, not the superintendent, will decide which books can be added or removed from the library. This change comes after a review of 14 books challenged by parents last year, many of which featured LGBTQ characters. The superintendent had suggested keeping these books, but the board's new policy now overrides that decision. The move has been labeled a "book ban" by some community members. Critics argue that the definitions used in the policy, such as "pervasive vulgarity," are vague. Additionally, there is a new 30-day waiting period for residents to challenge any new book before it can be shelved. During the board meeting, opinions were sharply divided. Supporters of the new policy praised the board for its decisions. One local resident expressed that he saw the policy as a careful approach to book selection rather than a ban. Meanwhile, opponents voiced their concerns and some protested with signs. Board member Ashley Fortier criticized the policy, stating it limits educational opportunities. She emphasized that while not every book is for every student, all students deserve access to books that resonate with them. The board's president, Phillip Morrissette, acknowledged the lengthy process it took to reach this decision. He, along with other supporters, expressed satisfaction with the outcome. However, board member Marc Casciani expressed concerns about the policy going too far. There are fears that the policy could lead to legal challenges. Parent and attorney Chris Cafardi suggested he might donate controversial books to test the board's new authority. He is in contact with the ACLU regarding any potential legal issues that may arise. This vote occurs just two months before primary elections on May 20, where four board positions will be contested. Current members, including those opposed to the policy, will be up for reelection, and some new candidates are also entering the race.