Strained U.S.-Europe relations affect F-35 jet purchases

The F-35 fighter jet, designed for use across NATO, faces uncertainty due to strained relations between the U.S. and Europe. Countries in NATO are reconsidering their plans to buy the jet amid concerns over U.S. policies, particularly those related to Ukraine and trade. Portugal's defense minister recently highlighted the U.S. stance within NATO as a reason for changing plans to replace its F-16s with F-35s. Meanwhile, Canada's new prime minister, Mark Carney, has called for a review of the country's F-35 purchase worth over $13 billion. Germany's order for the aircraft is also in doubt. The F-35 program was developed to create a common fighter for NATO forces. Its advanced features make it one of the top combat aircraft. However, it has faced criticism for high costs and delays. Some experts argue that losing the F-35 would mean losing valuable capabilities that support coordinated efforts among allies. Using the same aircraft offers NATO members benefits like easier communication and shared maintenance. Former U.S. Rep. Mac Thornberry stressed that a move away from the F-35 would weaken NATO's unity, which adversaries would want to exploit. Lockheed Martin, the contractor for the F-35, has expressed its commitment to allies like Canada and Portugal. Some countries are considering alternatives like the Saab JAS-39 Gripen, which is cheaper but less compatible with NATO systems. Concerns have also emerged about a possible "kill switch" that could disable the F-35s, creating distrust among European nations. Even though officials have dismissed this idea, it reflects fears regarding U.S. support during a conflict, especially with Russia. In the U.S., the F-35 has faced its own scrutiny. High-profile figures, including Elon Musk, have criticized it for being too expensive. Some officials acknowledge that rethinking the F-35's role makes sense, as unmanned systems gain traction. Overall, re-evaluating the F-35 places pressure on NATO's air defense capacity. While losing the jet would have a negative impact, experts believe NATO can still function without it, although it might reduce their effectiveness in joint operations.