Supreme Court case may impact internet access funding

A Supreme Court case is set to review a federal program that helps provide internet access to schools, libraries, and hospitals across the U.S. The case could affect funding for these essential services, which rely on the Universal Service Fund. The Universal Service Fund was created to help low-income Americans afford phone and internet services. However, a conservative consumer awareness group argues that relying on this fund is unconstitutional because it delegates power from Congress to federal agencies. Many communities, especially rural ones, struggle to provide reliable internet access. Libraries and schools like the Bullitt County Public Library in Kentucky rely heavily on the E-Rate program, which is funded by the Universal Service Fund. It allows these institutions to offer discounted internet rates. Critics of the program say it is a complex system that raises costs without sufficient oversight. They argue that it should instead be funded through standard congressional budget processes. Supporters, on the other hand, warn that cutting the fund could worsen the digital divide, particularly for low-income families. The Supreme Court’s decision, expected by the end of June, could lead to significant changes in how internet services are funded. This situation highlights ongoing tensions between federal agencies and the need for congressional approval for major programs. School and library officials emphasize that losing support from the E-Rate program would lead to higher costs and reduced services for their communities. They stress the necessity of affordable internet access for education, public safety, and job opportunities.