Trump cuts cultural programs, diminishing U.S. soft power

Former President Donald Trump’s administration has announced significant cuts to several cultural programs and international initiatives, indicating a shift in America's global influence. This includes ending a nearly $1 million grant to the International Writing Program in Iowa City, which has been a prominent center for literary exchange for over 50 years. Christopher Merrill, who leads the program, expressed concern that these changes suggest a departure from cultural diplomacy, often termed "soft power." This type of influence relies on culture and values rather than military might. Critics, including Harvard professor Joseph Nye, argue that Trump's approach favors coercion and transactional relationships over fostering goodwill with other nations. One notable consequence is the planned dismantling of the Voice of America (VOA), a broadcasting service that has shared democratic ideals since World War II. Confirming this change, an email was sent to approximately 1,300 VOA journalists notifying them of their placement on paid leave, effectively suspending operations at the outlet. Critics assert this move undercuts U.S. efforts to promote freedom of the press and spread reliable information in authoritarian regions. In response to the cutbacks, affected workers have filed lawsuits against the government and the new head of VOA, Kari Lake. Lake has publicly criticized the service, contributing to a perception that the current administration is engaged in undermining press freedoms. The impact of these cultural program cuts extends beyond financial aspects; many participants benefit from unique networking opportunities and shared experiences within the literary community. Writers like Mexico's Brenda Navarro have lamented the loss, suggesting that such changes diminish the richness of literary exchange and education. Overall, the decisions made by Trump's administration signal a new era in American cultural diplomacy, one that prioritizes other interests over the traditional promotion of soft power. This evolving strategy indicates a decline in the global narrative traditionally shaped by U.S. cultural initiatives.